Date Range:

From: To:

View all

  • Graduate Student Center Graduate Student Center
  • General Public Presentations General Public Presentations
  • Thesis/Dissertation Seminars Thesis/Dissertation Seminars
  • Arts and Humanities Seminars Arts and Humanities Seminars
  • Education Seminars Education Seminars
  • Health Professions Seminars Health Professions Seminars
  • Professional/Business Seminars Professional/Business Seminars
  • Social Sciences Seminars Social Sciences Seminars
  • STEM* Seminars STEM* Seminars
  • Social Events Social Events
  • Student and Professional Development Student and Professional Development
  • Informational Events Informational Events
  • Important Dates Important Dates

*STEM: Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics

International Community

Events Calendar   

Back to Summary

Thesis/Dissertation Seminars

Dissertation Defense: A Single Case Study on The Influence of Feedback on The Instructional Quality of a Preservice Elementary Teacher in Mathematics: The Instructional Quality Assessment Tool as a Resource

ED 306
January 16, 2018 @ 02:00 PM - 04:00 PM

Announcing the Final Examination of Ms. Makini A. Sutherland for the degree of Doctor of Education

The purpose of this single case study was to determine if a preservice elementary teacher's instruction would be influenced by feedback on mathematics lessons. The focus of the research was on the use of the Instructional Quality Assessment (IQA) (Boston 2012) toolkit as an integral part in the feedback process. The IQA toolkit provides number ratings as well as qualitative descriptive ratings of various aspects of the mathematics lesson, defined under two constructs, or groups, labeled Academic Rigor and Accountable Talk.

The researcher evaluated a preservice teacher's instruction on three occasions and facilitated feedback sessions following those observation sessions, integrating the number ratings of the IQA toolkit with the qualitative descriptions of expectations. It was found that there was an increase in ratings for both constructs of Academic Rigor and Accountable Talk over the period of three feedback cycles. There was a difference in how the students were facilitated in instruction over the three observations. The teacher became more aware of some of her behaviors in the classroom that contributed to the type of instruction given to students.

In reviewing the literature, there was limited evidence of the use of the IQA toolkit for the iterative process of teaching, feedback, and teaching informed by feedback. This research is therefore useful in expanding the use of the IQA toolkit for feedback purposes. Preservice teachers as well as in-service teachers can benefit from feedback focused on mathematics teaching that makes them more aware of their strengths and weaknesses so they are able to adjust instruction based on the feedback received.

Committee in Charge: Juli K. Dixon (Chair), Janet Andreasen, Kristopher Childs, Elizabeth Hoffman, Farshid Safi